both the kenyan government and Al Bashir of Sudan must give us space and go to hell...!!!
let me take you from the perspective of a normal Mwananchi: what i am really concerned about now is the rising cost of transportation (whether by bus or train or my personal car) in short just in case it is taking you a long time to decipher, FUEL COST HAS GONE UP!! another is the high cost of sugar and maize flour from my local kiosk or supermarket(A.K.A HIGH COST OF LIVING)
what i really don't care about is that drama you have created about i don't know who arresting who or not arresting who because of whatever reason..
but i could also take on you like an educated man, i don't care whether you guys do business together or eat at the same table.. what i want to know is that the rule of law has taken its course.
F.Y.I MR BASHIR... Kenya is not Sudan. over here, we have three arms of govt. (i am not a history teacher)
in short dumb-heads, we hate the drama!!!!!!
Tuesday, December 06, 2011
Monday, December 05, 2011
objectivity...!!! does the Kenyan media even know what that means?
there's a popular saying in swahili that "makosa ni kurudia makosa" whichever way you want to put it... meaning that no one should have an excuse for making the same mistake twice.
now to my point, there is this silly segment in the news called "the BIG question"... they would rather call it the silly question...
you are watching the news and the story is about some big-bellied politician.. then after the news story, the presenter says.." this brings us to our news segment, the big qstn, where we ask, would you vote for... blah blah blah?"
seriously!!! "would you" the word would is a past tense of will and a modal verb... i will not explain what those mean...(look it up on wiktionary) if you ask me if i would vote for someone, my answer can be, yes, no, why not, in comparison to, over who?.... etc. in short, i feel that they are supposed to give us two or more names to choose from, then the qstn becomes relevant.
like for example, "would you vote for X over Y in 2012?" but if they cannot give us two or more names, then they should as well ask" will you vote for X?" fullstop.. if your answer is yes, why? and if it is no, why?
anyway, that is why Kenyans who do not want to waste their time and money will never answer those questions.
frankly if you ask me if i would vote for A, my answer could be yes, and then ask me if i would vote for B the next day and my answer would still be yes, and so on for C, D, E, up to Z.. but if you simply ask me, among the following, A,B... Z, which big-bellied, self seeking, tax evasive, inciter... (all the adjectives that best fit them) would you vote for, then choosing a lesser evil wouldn't be that difficult..
now to my point, there is this silly segment in the news called "the BIG question"... they would rather call it the silly question...
you are watching the news and the story is about some big-bellied politician.. then after the news story, the presenter says.." this brings us to our news segment, the big qstn, where we ask, would you vote for... blah blah blah?"
seriously!!! "would you" the word would is a past tense of will and a modal verb... i will not explain what those mean...(look it up on wiktionary) if you ask me if i would vote for someone, my answer can be, yes, no, why not, in comparison to, over who?.... etc. in short, i feel that they are supposed to give us two or more names to choose from, then the qstn becomes relevant.
like for example, "would you vote for X over Y in 2012?" but if they cannot give us two or more names, then they should as well ask" will you vote for X?" fullstop.. if your answer is yes, why? and if it is no, why?
anyway, that is why Kenyans who do not want to waste their time and money will never answer those questions.
frankly if you ask me if i would vote for A, my answer could be yes, and then ask me if i would vote for B the next day and my answer would still be yes, and so on for C, D, E, up to Z.. but if you simply ask me, among the following, A,B... Z, which big-bellied, self seeking, tax evasive, inciter... (all the adjectives that best fit them) would you vote for, then choosing a lesser evil wouldn't be that difficult..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)